On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 21:11 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 18:58 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 17:14 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > Gee, I looked at Fedora's rpm CVS...wasn't a single bit of indication of > > > *any* activity of any sort there...makes a nice example of just how > > > broken and disconnected from modern SCM management our system currently > > > is. > > > > That's right, we wouldn't want to see inflight development in the HEAD > > of our package source control. That rapidly gets in the way of doing > > mass rebuilds, scripted code compliance tests, targeted fixes strikes, > > etc, etc... > > > > Our package SCM is not a software development SCM. > > Because you are not being in the least bit imaginative with branches > does not in the least justify the statement you are making. OK, how about this: Nobody has the time nor has anyone shown overwhelming benefits to rework our entire infrastructure to deal with a new SCM for _packages_ so that people can do code _development_ on them when that should all be done _upstream_. Again, scratch your own itch if it's bothering you that badly. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
