Re: Heads-up: brand new RPM version about to hit rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 20:12 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 16:09 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
[...]
> > The problem really lies with whether or not this would satisfy, as a
> > written offer, the requirements under which we distribute or ask our
> > ambassadors to distribute our binaries.
> 
> OK, well regardless, if this meets the requirements, then certainly an
> immutably tagged exploded SCM would too (for far less space requirements

Leaving aside discussing the merits of it, you don't need to use
immutable tags (pkg-1_0-1_fcX) as you can just record the exact revision
from which you built the package (which should already be immutable).

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux