On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 09:21 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 20:12 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 16:09 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> [...]
> > > The problem really lies with whether or not this would satisfy, as a
> > > written offer, the requirements under which we distribute or ask our
> > > ambassadors to distribute our binaries.
> >
> > OK, well regardless, if this meets the requirements, then certainly an
> > immutably tagged exploded SCM would too (for far less space requirements
>
> Leaving aside discussing the merits of it, you don't need to use
> immutable tags (pkg-1_0-1_fcX) as you can just record the exact revision
> from which you built the package (which should already be immutable).
You are correct on that point, but the immutable tag is generally more
readable as part of the output of rpm -i <binary package>.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
