On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:04 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > So this bug will happen whenever SELinux was disabled. Note: This bug ... provided the fact SELinux is not transparent ... can you exclude other cases? > Whether or not > you disabled it during install or post install. So your example of why > SELinux needs to be able to be disabled in Anaconda is flawed. May-be, may-be not, ... I may be wrong in this particular case, but otherwise I disagree with you - I regret having to say this, but I've been too often hit issues with SELinux-policies in all the years SELinux is in Fedora to have grant it much trust. Anyway, another case: SELinux's run-time memory consumption is too big for some classes of (low end) HW. Related to it: I had experienced cases where selinux-policy updates took hours and occasionally caused kernel oops'es. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
