-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:04 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> So this bug will happen whenever SELinux was disabled. > Note: This bug ... provided the fact SELinux is not transparent ... can > you exclude other cases? > >> Whether or not >> you disabled it during install or post install. So your example of why >> SELinux needs to be able to be disabled in Anaconda is flawed. > May-be, may-be not, ... I may be wrong in this particular case, but > otherwise I disagree with you - I regret having to say this, but I've > been too often hit issues with SELinux-policies in all the years SELinux > is in Fedora to have grant it much trust. > Yes, I understand this. And if bugs/problems in the past cause you to not run with SELinux, that is fine. But you have not given an example of why having/not having the option in Anaconda changes this. > Anyway, another case: SELinux's run-time memory consumption is too big > for some classes of (low end) HW. > For low end hardware you will probably need to do custom install anyways. But > Related to it: I had experienced cases where selinux-policy updates took > hours and occasionally caused kernel oops'es. > Depending on the size of a system if it needed to relabel a major portion it could take a very long time. Kernel oopses are regrettable. > Ralf > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkh1ErIACgkQrlYvE4MpobOdUACgwIIIJNoptR7llUqHEmaSVi6X vZsAoJNvOMmlGIBXd2i0ajll9rHMrmAU =/HDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
