Re: Request to re-add option to disable SELinux - compromise

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 18:50 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:

> However sabotaging the installer to make it impossible for people to 
> disable it at installation, now that's where I say "that doesn't make 
> any sense", cf my original email.

"Sabotaging"? For crying out loud... there is no immediate need to be
able to do this at installation time, it can just as well be done
afterwards (or you can use kickstart to do it).

One question nobody has been able to answer to my satisfaction yet: Why
would it be essential that SELinux can be disabled from the installer
vs. from the installed system? Last time I checked, the plan was to get
non-essential functionality out of anaconda.

NB: zombo.com[1] lives on virtual console #2 for your SELinux disabling
pleasure.

[1]: http://www.zombo.com

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux