-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Corsepius wrote: | On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:58 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: | |> One question nobody has been able to answer to my satisfaction yet: Why |> would it be essential that SELinux can be disabled from the installer |> vs. from the installed system? | One point: Once SELinux had been active, it can cause problems, despite | it had been disabled, afterwards: | C.f.: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453365 | | Ralf | | This is a bug in code, and I am not sure this would not have happened if SELinux was disabled in the first place. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkh0w7cACgkQrlYvE4MpobPVQACfeKeTPGdvykyNOdclQq/pdNUx j+MAn2v0no1EusfF+VsvAOUyN7ZBH6OY =lBlz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
