On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 10:05:05AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Daniel, > > > > we are looking at splitting gvfs a bit more finegrained for F10, but > > doing such a split in the middle of a stable release is somewhat hard to > > do, so some forking may be necessary for F9. > > > > But if we work through these issues now, your F11 upgrade may be a lot > > easier... > Ive been taking steps so that OLPC will be able to track rawhide always. > this should help make it easier to keep track of image bloat. hopefully there > will be a F10 based build We could sure use some scripts to anaylse RPM deps on a nightly basis and produces reports on interesting stats. eg disk footprint of the chain starting from package 'X', or list of dependancies from package 'X', or perhaps something that given a kickstart file can report the total size of the package set listed in the kickstart without actually going through the full livecd (or equiv) build process. We are fighting a similar battle to OLPC with the oVirt project which has a live CD we're trying to keep under 64 MB in size. Dainel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
