Re: long term support release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Fedora has a unique situation in this respect though. By policy RHEL will not add new features in updates and since the upstream app developer generally only cares about going forward, that means someone has to do the work of backporting bugfixes minus features into something that sort-of resembles the originally shipped app version. Fedora, however is perfectly free to fix the fedora version by shipping an update to the current app version, accepting the upstream fix in it fully-featured form.

The situation is not as black and white as you make it out to be. RHEL has occasionally pushed new features as updates and Fedora has done backports.


Agreed, but there is a general trend... And ideally, I'd like to see alternative update repos so both could be available for everything that could be built both ways so only the people with their own 'no new features' policies would be stuck with the downrev versions of applications they use.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux