On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 09:16 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > However, I recall FESCO (or had it been FAB?) having decided on FC's > > short life-time and to support EPEL. Both decisions have been severe > > mistakes, IMO. > > Supporting EPEL is a good idea, but not letting those who want to take > care of long term fedora is in my opinion a mistake. In most cases epel > spec files couuld be used for fedora long term, in my opinion there > would certainly be synergies between the 2 projects. > Maybe I missed something. Who/What is stopping someone(s) from taking on Long term support for fedora if they choose to? I don't recall anyone stopping anyone from doing it. I mean we stopped spinning cd-sized iso releases. Fedora Unity didn't care for that and they started doing their own. Not only did no one stop them no one CAN stop them from doing it. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
