On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 07:59 -0500, David Smith wrote:
>
> Note that we leave things so that native compiles still work. We then
> check native dependencies (_arch == _build_arch) against our mock
> chroot's native rpm database, then check cross dependencies (_arch !=
> _build_arch) against the mock chroot's target rpm database.
>
> Target versions of autoconf and sed aren't needed since nothing links
> against anything in those packages (those packages are only run
> natively). The only problem with this scheme is that we end up with an
> extra native dependency of libblah-devel (which really isn't needed
> since nothing links against it in the cross compile). But the benefit
> of unaffected native compiles outweighed the extra dependency.
I might go so far as to suggest that the benefit of avoiding that
%if "%{_arch" == "%{_build_arch}" stuff in the specfile might outweigh
the extra dependencies on autoconf and sed, too.
One way of handling dependencies in mock for cross-builds might be to
install the full set of dependencies for _both_ host and target
architectures.
--
dwmw2
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
