Re: Fedora and Cross Compiling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse wrote:
Before we get to actually cross-compiling something for release, it
would be good to get cross-compilers into Fedora.

Making a cross-binutils package isn't hard; it's a relatively
modification to our existing binutils package to make it build for
multiple %targets.

Making a cross-gcc package which targets linux-elf is harder, because of
the evil recursive dependencies to which you refer above. It would be
good if we could get that working though.

Hi,

Yep, we've been through this a few times. Having discussed this with you a number of times before, I know where you're coming from. We really should be able to build gcc without having to build parts of glibc in the process. That said, this is really only an exercise in bootstrapping which doesn't happen very often.

Let us, for example, pretend we're just discussing cross compilation for existing archs. Because of the iterative nature of these builds, everything we need is already there to build the cross compiler. We have kernel headers and we have a glibc rpm for the target arch. All that we need in some machinery to pull in files from a different arch and extract them into a sys-root.

As gcc matures, it's likely that the libgcc problem will go away by it being split out. At that time, the chicken/egg problem will be solved without having to resort to clever hacks.

--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@xxxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux