On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 15:46 -0600, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Nah, wrt. to cross linux toolchains there are other ways. > > Well, if you want to be pedantic, sure. To be more precise, it is, at > present, the only way to get from nothing but sources to having fully > functional binaries. If you already have binaries that's another matter. > > > 1. If a native target distro exists, one can repackage the target's > > glibc binaries into a <target>-sys-root rpm, and then build gcc against > > this glibc. It's what I do in my toolchain packages. Some people hate it > > because "I don't build everything from scratch", but it has tremendous > > advantages. > > You can, but you end up with binaries for one arch inside an rpm > designated for another. Not quite. You end up with the target's sys-root's files ("target binaries", blobs of arbitrary binary data) inside of a "noarch" rpm. > I'm hoping to take this to the point where you > can bring in rpms from one arch to cross build another another. You can. sys-root packages aiming at cross-compilers are "noarch" rpms to the host. > > 3. Build incrementally. All you need to is to once insert a glibc > > sys-root binary into the buildsystem (by "bootstrap" or 1. or 2.), then > > subsequently build gcc and glibc from source. > > Some people also hate this, but it's essentally the same approach as > > glibc and gcc are being built on Fedora. > > I think of this as The Fedora Way (tm). Right, this way should be applicable for Fedora->Fedora toolchains. However, it is more generally applicable. > After discussing with dwmw2 > some more, there are still some drawbacks wrt gcc for my own goals: We > actually want to produce gcc support libraries for the target in an rpm > for the target arch. Well, IMO this plan is not useful and doesn't fit into the working principles of rpm, because it confuses host architecture with target architecture. What I could envision to be made functional is a wrapper around rpm, using another "per-cross-target" rpmdb to add native target rpms into sys-roots. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list