On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 18:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > It's quite simple: You have to agree on a common language (or a limited > > > set of thereof) otherwise you can't communicate with your customers > > > (here: users) and 3rd parties (here: authorities). For a US based > > > distro, I'd expect this language to be English. > > > > > > This would at least enable users to translate it into his native > > > language without major effort. > > > > Aren't you on the Packaging Committee? > Yes, but ... the FPC only deals with questions related to "how to > package" (technical questions) and not with political issues (What to > package and what not) rsp. legal issues (Which licenses are considered > valid.) > > In my understanding, the "what" is FESCO's job, the "legal" is GdK's > job. You seem to have a good understanding of the issue. There are no rules that say you can't write a guideline up for submission. And I personally think something like this will need to go into the Packaging guidelines anyway, so it can start in the FPC. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
