On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 16:34 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 06:43 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 05:55 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > What exactly is your point? > > > In a nutshell: > > > > > > Fedora ships packages with un-readable, non-verifiable licenses. > > > > Hyperbole > > I guess, you mean FESCO and FPB ignorance? > > No? In international projects, normally, standardizing languages is one > of the first step - Apparently forgotten in Fedora. > > No? Then you'll probably be able to provide a translation of this within > seconds: > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/python-mecab/devel/MeCab-license-Fedora?root=extras&rev=1.1&view=markup Me personally? No. But just because you and I can't read it doesn't make it un-readable and non-verifiable. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
