On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 18:58 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > The Fedora wiki pages link to a list of all approved licenses for > > packages. You could systematically go through and print off each of > > these. > > > > > In general, some of packages can have its unique licenses, which > compatible with Fedora, but have its own text... True. > > It's a bit hard for Fedora to distribute hard copy material given that > > Fedora doesn't distribute anything physical. > > > > But it is more hard for individual user to print, translate and certify. I always forget about translating. I blame it on me being a stupid US born citizen. > Moreover, there are enough troubles with "Fedora in production > environment" due to innovations/stabilities. An addition of legal issues > can just kill it. > Theoretically, it can lead to a situation, when RHEL, based on Fedora as > the upstream, will be based on distro which actually is not used/tested > anywhere in business/production. I understand your concern, but unfortunately I don't see how Fedora as a project can really help here... josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
