On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:11:18PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I thought you claimed this is one of the reviews and were corrected by > someone else. The argument was not as clear as your statement. > Make sure you clarify any legal issues in > fedora-maintainers list before enforcing it on reviewers. At any rate it That's not really possible, there are too many issues arising in each review. > looks we need a FAQ on common legal issues. If you have a list I can > write it up and run it via Red Hat Legal. I already asked and Spot responded to most of my issues (especially the files with author and no license). He agreed more or less with the practices I proposed, I'll try to find his response, maybe we could put that, together with the srpm agregation explanation on the wiki. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
