On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:26 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:06 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >>> > >>>> I don't think it is particularly difficult, but there are a number of > >>>> constraints (like > >>>> keeping all trademarked logos in a separate package). What we need > >>>> before making > >>>> any decisions here is a summary of the current situation (what "artwork" > >>>> packages > >>>> do we have, how do they interact, also wrt to derived distributions, > >>>> etc) and a list > >>>> of goals for a reorganization. I'm sure interested community members can > >>>> take a > >>>> whack at that. > >>>> > >>> were you planning in changes in this area vis anaconda? > >>> > >> One thing that was discussed a little at FUDCon was moving some of the > >> trademarked logo bits into a separate "branding" repository. > >> > >> That doesn't really have much to do with redhat-artwork, though. > >> Historically speaking, redhat-artwork was created to contain all > >> Bluecurve bits (and could as well have been called "bluecurve-artwork", > >> it was just named prior to the name Bluecurve and with the thought of > >> letting the theme change over time...) > >> > > > > Matthias, > > So it sounds like all that needs to happen is: > > > > 1. rename the pkg to system-artwork (add an obsoletes redhat-artwork) > > 2. get rid of the bluecurve libs into another pkg > > 3. profit! > > > > Does that sound right to you > > > > Moving the libs to another package lets redhat-artwork become noarch, > sure. It doesn't address > most of the other issues with artwork being spread over several packages > in a confusing way... okay, that wasn't clear from the earlier emails. Why don't we take this one step at a time: Steps: 1. get rid of the bluecurve bits and fix up redhat-artwork to be noarch 2. start the package reorg for all of our artwork How does that sound? With regard to number 2 is there anyone outside of yourself who might have a good enough understanding of where all the art is to comment appropriately? thanks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
