Re: Why is redhat-artwork multi-lib?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> I don't think it is particularly difficult, but there are a number of 
> constraints (like
> keeping all trademarked logos in a separate package). What we need 
> before making
> any decisions here is a summary of the current situation (what "artwork" 
> packages
> do we have, how do they interact, also wrt to derived distributions, 
> etc) and a list
> of goals for a reorganization. I'm sure interested community members can 
> take a
> whack at that.

Jeremy,
 were you planning in changes in this area vis anaconda? 
-sv


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux