On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I don't think it is particularly difficult, but there are a number of > > constraints (like > > keeping all trademarked logos in a separate package). What we need > > before making > > any decisions here is a summary of the current situation (what "artwork" > > packages > > do we have, how do they interact, also wrt to derived distributions, > > etc) and a list > > of goals for a reorganization. I'm sure interested community members can > > take a > > whack at that. > were you planning in changes in this area vis anaconda? One thing that was discussed a little at FUDCon was moving some of the trademarked logo bits into a separate "branding" repository. That doesn't really have much to do with redhat-artwork, though. Historically speaking, redhat-artwork was created to contain all Bluecurve bits (and could as well have been called "bluecurve-artwork", it was just named prior to the name Bluecurve and with the thought of letting the theme change over time...) Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
