On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:06 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:06 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > I don't think it is particularly difficult, but there are a number of > > > constraints (like > > > keeping all trademarked logos in a separate package). What we need > > > before making > > > any decisions here is a summary of the current situation (what "artwork" > > > packages > > > do we have, how do they interact, also wrt to derived distributions, > > > etc) and a list > > > of goals for a reorganization. I'm sure interested community members can > > > take a > > > whack at that. > > were you planning in changes in this area vis anaconda? > > One thing that was discussed a little at FUDCon was moving some of the > trademarked logo bits into a separate "branding" repository. > > That doesn't really have much to do with redhat-artwork, though. > Historically speaking, redhat-artwork was created to contain all > Bluecurve bits (and could as well have been called "bluecurve-artwork", > it was just named prior to the name Bluecurve and with the thought of > letting the theme change over time...) Matthias, So it sounds like all that needs to happen is: 1. rename the pkg to system-artwork (add an obsoletes redhat-artwork) 2. get rid of the bluecurve libs into another pkg 3. profit! Does that sound right to you? -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
