Re: Why is redhat-artwork multi-lib?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 11:17 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> >  So it sounds like all that needs to happen is:
> > 
> >  1. rename the pkg to system-artwork (add an obsoletes redhat-artwork)
> >  2. get rid of the bluecurve libs into another pkg
> >  3. profit!
> > 
> > Does that sound right to you?
> 
> Actually, considering that we're not even using them by default,
> would we want to split the bluecurve theme out to the point
> where it's not even shipped by default?

+1

-sv


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux