Dave Jones schrieb: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 06:55:12PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Dave Jones schrieb: > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:15:10AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 02:22, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > > If I would review the kernel for the extras merge I'd say "fix this". > > > > > But I suspect davej won't like to call the kernels 2.6.20 (e.g. > > > > > 2.6.20-1.2906.rc4.fc7 for example) before they are actually 2.6.20. > > > > > This will be one of the problem areas we'll probably have to deal with > > > > > when it comes to reviewing Core packages for the Extras merge. > > > > Personally, I'm all for giving the kernel a pass on this and some of the > > > > other... interesting things in the spec. That is, unless the reviewer not > > > > only complains about something in the spec, but also produces a viable rework > > > > of what the spec is trying to accomplish. The kernel is one of our speshul > > > > packages that really does need some special consideration. > > > Really. And if you want to do something useful with the kernel package, > > > there's no shortage of real bugs that need fixing. > > > > There are guidelines for packaging. They contain a standard for naming > > pre-release packages. The kernel package clearly is violating it as the > > version of the kernel is in fact 2.6.20-rc4, but the %version is 2.6.19. > > Can we agree so far? > > I don't consider rc's as released versions. The package version number > should state the latest released version that package is based on. > If we were to go down this route, we'd have to contend with the > other upstream naming conventions too. > look at the combinations we have :- 2.6.19, 2.6.19-git1, 2.6.19-rc1, 2.6.19.1, > 2.6.19-rc1-git1, 2.6.19.1-rc1 We have rules to make it work; see: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list