On 09.01.2007 02:16, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 11:55 -0700, Lamont Peterson wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 04:13am, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Updated Packages:
[snip]
kernel-2.6.19-1.2906.fc7
------------------------
* Sun Jan 07 2007 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.20rc4
So, Dave ...
1. Is this a 2.6.19 or 2.6.20 kernel (or that changelog entry a typo)?
2.6.20rc4 He can't increment the version to 2.6.20 until the official
release because of RPM NVR rules. E.g. 2.6.20rc4 > 2.6.20
Sure he can -- we even have rules for that; those suggest to call it
2.6.20 even afaics:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a
If I would review the kernel for the extras merge I'd say "fix this".
But I suspect davej won't like to call the kernels 2.6.20 (e.g.
2.6.20-1.2906.rc4.fc7 for example) before they are actually 2.6.20.
This will be one of the problem areas we'll probably have to deal with
when it comes to reviewing Core packages for the Extras merge.
CU
thl
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
