Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 12:55, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> There are guidelines for packaging. They contain a standard for naming >> pre-release packages. The kernel package clearly is violating it as the >> version of the kernel is in fact 2.6.20-rc4, but the %version is 2.6.19. >> Can we agree so far? > Actually no. The 2.6.20-rc4 tarball isn't used, rather the 2.6.19 tarball is, > with lots of patches add on top of that. The tarball IMHO is not relevant. The upstream version is 2.6.20-rc4. It's a pre-release. And we have rules for how to package those: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Section "Pre-Release packages": http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
