On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:15:10AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 02:22, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > If I would review the kernel for the extras merge I'd say "fix this". > > But I suspect davej won't like to call the kernels 2.6.20 (e.g. > > 2.6.20-1.2906.rc4.fc7 for example) before they are actually 2.6.20. > > > > This will be one of the problem areas we'll probably have to deal with > > when it comes to reviewing Core packages for the Extras merge. > > Personally, I'm all for giving the kernel a pass on this and some of the > other... interesting things in the spec. That is, unless the reviewer not > only complains about something in the spec, but also produces a viable rework > of what the spec is trying to accomplish. The kernel is one of our speshul > packages that really does need some special consideration. Really. And if you want to do something useful with the kernel package, there's no shortage of real bugs that need fixing. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
