On 1/9/07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
I know. I was referring to Evolution alone drawing in most of GNOME as dependencies. Now I personally don't have a problem with having to install GNOME libraries (I install whatever (appropriately licensed) libraries programs I want to use or even just try out require), but I'm not convinced Evolution is a good reason to include them. (In fact, it seems to be the most hated default app in Fedora judging from the comments on the mailing lists, some GNOME users are looking for an alternative too, some even switched to Kontact or KMail.)
I'll back the idea for not including evolution in KDE spin. Hmm having evolution on a kde spin isn't really a kde spin. Kontact is already among core kde packages why should the heck be a replacement for that ? at least evolution is being supplied on the repositories. As far are firefox and openoffice are concerned, I'm ok with them, but not evolution. example: Kontact communicates very well with kwallet for password storage. Now if we include evolution in the kde spin, should we be working to provide such feature for evolution? Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
