Re: Future Fedora Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 16:09 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote:
> There's also GnuTLS, which (according to `yum info`) is less than a 
> megabyte fully installed. Not sure if fits the requirements for this 
> though...

Hmmm, gnutls-devel has .a files in it? GnuTLS might fit, but the goal
would be to use something like OpenVPN or an IPsec IKE daemon like
racoon or whatever Openswan uses. Unless they can be compiled against
GnuTLS its kinda moot...

(There's tinc, but its naive encryption implementation doesn't thrill
me.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux