Re: Future Fedora Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 10:08 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
What's wrong with GPL programs using the Mozilla implementation?
Last time I checked NSS was totally GPL compatible.
mozilla-nss requires mozilla-nspr.  libnss3.so also pulls in
libpthread.so.  Those are pretty heavy requirements for SSL.

Even OpenSSL is so bloaty that the smallest I can get it down to (on
MIPS, who's code size seem to be about 2x i386) is 1.5mb. Making it
impossible to fit into the 2mb flash on a belkin router. Sigh.

There's MatrixSSL, but there's next to nothing that actually uses it...

There's also GnuTLS, which (according to `yum info`) is less than a megabyte fully installed. Not sure if fits the requirements for this though...

--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux