Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
Yeah, I agree. OpenSSL seems to be the most comprehensive, but
its licence stinks and this is why gnutls was written in the first
place. Now that Mozilla adopted the triple MPL/GPL/LGPL license,
there's no reason to keep gnutls any more.
GNUtls is needed for GPL programs using SSL.
What's wrong with GPL programs using the Mozilla implementation?
Last time I checked NSS was totally GPL compatible.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
