Re: Future Fedora Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia 24-05-2006, śro o godzinie 19:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram napisał(a):
[..]
> Are you claiming that its ok to violate licenses as long as the other
> end doesnt have lawyers? If its a license violation, it should be fixed.
> Period.

No. I'm claiming only: *if* [1] now openssl violate licenses and moving
only few from hundriets projects to gnutls changes nothing on this area
but changes distribution (makes them worse) on technical level.

[1] word *if* is importand in this case because openssl is distributed
under Apache-style license (BSD license derivat). If openssl breaks
anything on this area probably apache braks this too.
Also look on: http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL

For me moving to gnutls hang only on "Some GPL software copyright
holders claim that you infringe on their rights". So question in this
case is: are this people are lawyers or not and anyone must care on this
or not ?

kloczek


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux