Re: Future Fedora Development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> - multiple digests operation (openssl, gnutls, nss .. some programs are
>>   now linked with *all* avalaible implemntations 8-0 ),
>
>Yeah, I agree.  OpenSSL seems to be the most comprehensive, but
>its licence stinks and this is why gnutls was written in the first
>place.  Now that Mozilla adopted the triple MPL/GPL/LGPL license,
>there's no reason to keep gnutls any more.

We need to try to streamline the number of SSL implementations for another
reason, FIPS 140-2 certifications. I think that FIPS 200 will be applicable next
year which pulls in the requirement of all crypto being certified.

-Steve

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux