On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 11:51 -0700, Steve G wrote: > >> - multiple digests operation (openssl, gnutls, nss .. some programs are > >> now linked with *all* avalaible implemntations 8-0 ), > > > >Yeah, I agree. OpenSSL seems to be the most comprehensive, but > >its licence stinks and this is why gnutls was written in the first > >place. Now that Mozilla adopted the triple MPL/GPL/LGPL license, > >there's no reason to keep gnutls any more. > > We need to try to streamline the number of SSL implementations for another > reason, FIPS 140-2 certifications. I think that FIPS 200 will be applicable next > year which pulls in the requirement of all crypto being certified. > > -Steve Which SSL implementation do you plan to standardize on? Has any potential licensing conflicts with OpenSSL and GPL programs been discussed? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
