On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Yeah, I agree. OpenSSL seems to be the most comprehensive, but > its licence stinks and this is why gnutls was written in the first > place. Now that Mozilla adopted the triple MPL/GPL/LGPL license, > there's no reason to keep gnutls any more. GNUtls is needed for GPL programs using SSL. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
