Dne 18. 12. 24 v 22:21 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:This is not recent example, but really bad example of PP's work IMHO: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/c31c7edb6913eb7417ee68c59997548df2943ddeI do not think nitpicking over _ten year old_ commits is helpful.
PP should lead by example IMHO. And and this is not any different! https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tiktoken/c/66a5632ba66ed27b6d1d633592724d6be612d638There is no explanation, there is no BZ ticket, it did not come via PR, it was not discussed as far as I can judge.
So what really is helpful if not comparing ten years old behavior to current behavior? How comes Matt that you are not the first one at least admitting that there is something wrong with the old example (and you should be already aware about the new one)? Where is the new Peter learned from his previous mistakes? How comes that if 7 members of FESCo stands against this, they are harassed on this ML (and I can likely start to count myself into that group)? And I genuinely wonder who will join FESCo next round?
Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
