Dne 16. 12. 24 v 23:13 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):And based on my experience, I doubt this particular provenpackager status was stripped based on something like that.Sure, I guess we all agree that the line is fuzzy and probably not very well documented/defined. That does not mean we use that to justify problematic provenpackager behavior.I agree with Miro. I doubt anyone complains about release-bumps.In past, I complained about other PP commits (not probinson) - they changed somehow random parts of spec. E.g. URL in SOURCEX. Or /usr/bin to %{_bindir}. This changes were either problematic for my workflow or simply incorrect. And these changes (directly done in dist-git) were not triggered by any issue. Though, I was alway able to resolve it with the author without the need to reach FESCO.
This is not recent example, but really bad example of PP's work IMHO: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/c31c7edb6913eb7417ee68c59997548df2943dde Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
