Dne 16. 12. 24 v 7:03 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
And based on my experience, I doubt this particular provenpackager status was stripped based on something like that.
Sure, I guess we all agree that the line is fuzzy and probably not very well documented/defined. That does not mean we
use that to justify problematic provenpackager behavior.
I agree with Miro.
I doubt anyone complains about release-bumps.
In past, I complained about other PP commits (not probinson) - they changed somehow random parts of spec. E.g. URL in
SOURCEX. Or /usr/bin to %{_bindir}. This changes were either problematic for my workflow or simply incorrect. And these
changes (directly done in dist-git) were not triggered by any issue. Though, I was alway able to resolve it with the
author without the need to reach FESCO.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
