On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:48:02PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > > > I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it > > > is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream > > > to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to commit changes > > > into a package we don't directly own as virt maintainers. > > > > How do you plan to install the new package into the buildroot, so that > > it's there when the SRPM is generated? > > > > (Maybe dynamic build dependencies can be used to solve this without > > buildroot preseeding, but seems a bit convoluted.) > > For better or worse redhat-rpm-config has Requires on a whole bunch of > these *-srpm-macros packages: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/blob/rawhide/f/redhat-rpm-config.spec#_94 > > AIUI that is how the buildroot gets populated. Isn't this only needed for historical compat ? I was anticipating that apps would directly "BuildRequires: qemu-srpm-macros", *not* get it indirectly via redhat-rpm-config With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
