Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Daniel P. Berrangé:

> I think I'd prefer to stay away from redhat-rpm-config. Not because it
> is a problem in Fedora, but because it will cause us pain downstream
> to deal with RHEL development process bureaucracy to commit changes
> into a package we don't directly own as virt maintainers.

How do you plan to install the new package into the buildroot, so that
it's there when the SRPM is generated?

(Maybe dynamic build dependencies can be used to solve this without
buildroot preseeding, but seems a bit convoluted.)

Thanks,
Florian

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux