Re: Proposed qemu-srpm-macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > One question is whether it's better to add this as a sub-package of
> > qemu, or as a new source package.  Using a new source package means we
> > won't be introducing awkward circular build dependencies, or a
> > heavyweight build dependency on qemu for non-virt packages.  The price
> > is the overhead of having another source package.
>
> Given that this going to change quite rarely, you could stick it
> directly into redhat-rpm-config as well, similar to what we have today
> with /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.valgrind-srpm.
>

Please don't. I don't want it there. It makes things complicated when
redhat-rpm-config gets changed/backported incompatibly in RHEL.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux