Re: Building mixxx for ppc64le (f40)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:03:42 +0000
Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I was running the build processes for Mixxx 2.4.2 release on RPMFusion
> 
> It ran fine, except in F40 for ppc64le, in where some dependency doesn't
> exist in Everything.

this is likely an outdated metadata issue between RPMFusion and Fedora.
Please check with the RPMFusion team first. Probably just retrying the
build after a while will fix the issue.


		Dan
 
> I am not the original maintainer and as such, didn't create the spec file,
> or had this issue in the few releases I actually managed to do.
> 
> Humbly asking for assistance, as I'm out of my depth here
> 
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=661020
> https://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/1023/661023/root.log
> 
> Thanks,
> Luis
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux