Hi, > On 22. Jul 2024, at 20:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > At this point, this sounds like the best approach. > The problem is well understood and the build failures are trivially > resolved by adding a single BuildRequires line or a single define. > > If we start changing things again, some packages will already adapted > will need to adapt again, and overall there'll much more confusion. I won’t object to this, it’s overall less work for Dmitry and me. However, we should still consider the effect this will have on developers that build software on Fedora — they will also have to specify -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE now or see failing builds, and we don’t really see that impact until 41 releases. -- Clemens Lang RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
