Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 4:28 PM Clemens Lang <cllang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
>
> > On 22. Jul 2024, at 15:01, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The CentOS approach isn't a deprecation, it's flat out removal. It's a
> > completely different change.
>
> This isn’t correct. The headers are removed, but the ABI is still present in CentOS Stream, so it is not flat out removal.

This is arguing about semantics, but probably the difference is that
packages in Fedora really MUST be kept in a state where they can be
rebuilt at any time, and removing the headers breaks that. It doesn't
break existing packages, but as soon as any changes need to be made to
any package that depends on those headers (or just a plain rebuild for
some other change in the distribution, or a mass rebuild), it *is*
equivalent to a removal.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux