On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 8:57 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 01:34:39PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > So I wonder if it's worth changing the engine deprecation mechanism in > > Fedora to the one we have in CentOS and if yes, what is the mechanism > > for such a change. > > Does is make sense at this point? The mass rebuild is (almost?) finished > and I would expect that packages that needed to be updated for this > already were. > > Do you have any statistics about how many packages still fail to > build because of the lacking header file? > The CentOS approach isn't a deprecation, it's flat out removal. It's a completely different change. Is anyone helping to migrate users of the engine API to newer APIs? If that's not happening, then there's no way to support removing the engine API from Fedora's OpenSSL. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
