Re: Fedora rawhide (to be f41) and openssl engines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Zbyszek,

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 2:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 01:34:39PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > So I wonder if it's worth changing the engine deprecation mechanism in
> > Fedora to the one we have in CentOS and if yes, what is the mechanism
> > for such a change.
>
> Does is make sense at this point? The mass rebuild is (almost?) finished
> and I would expect that packages that needed to be updated for this
> already were.
>
> Do you have any statistics about how many packages still fail to
> build because of the lacking header file?

I've seen 10-15 email/Slack threads related to the change.
Most of them were resolved via explicit CFLAGS += -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE


-- 
Dmitry Belyavskiy

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux