On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So I wonder if it's worth changing the engine deprecation mechanism in > Fedora to the one we have in CentOS and if yes, what is the mechanism > for such a change. I think you are free to submit a (very) late change request, but changing what was approved (and what some people have already adopted to) without a new FESCo approval seems very very wrong to me, as it would seem to make a mockery of the entire change request process (i.e. lets get a change approved, and then change the details afterwards). It would seem to me that if the unexpected fallout is considered to be too great, the proper approach is to revert the entire change, and re-propose in a future release with a revised proposal (where all the discussions can happen all over again). -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
