Hi Neal, > On 22. Jul 2024, at 15:01, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The CentOS approach isn't a deprecation, it's flat out removal. It's a > completely different change. This isn’t correct. The headers are removed, but the ABI is still present in CentOS Stream, so it is not flat out removal. For Fedora, we could change this to keep the headers and the binary support present, but define `OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE` unless a special preprocessor define overrides it. > Is anyone helping to migrate users of the engine API to newer APIs? If > that's not happening, then there's no way to support removing the > engine API from Fedora's OpenSSL. We’re happy to help maintainers that want to do this. We may do it ourselves for selected components. We will not fix every single use ourselves. -- Clemens Lang RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
