Dne 25. 06. 24 v 12:10 Dan Horák napsal(a):
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:57:49 +0200 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dne 24. 06. 24 v 20:03 Peter Robinson napsal(a):On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of fire one more build? Users would need to choose v1 / v2 / v3 ISO but what else?I can think of three problems which would need to be dealt with 1. Resource limitations in infrastructure hardware. You are going to add to the amount of builds on 1 set of hardware which is already doing x86_64 and i686. You are going to add to the storage issues that Fedora Infrastructure has to juggle on the maximum 100TB koji partition (with 90TB causing some amount of degradation) due to extra packages and composes. 2. Resource limitations in infrastructure staff. Fedora Infra is doing more with less and each additional architecture and focus increases that load. 3. Resource limitations on packagers. Packagers will need to add yet another bug set to cover and determine "is it only on VX" or not.Yes, understandably. But are there technical limitations?No, and you could argue to get rid of i686BTW I guess that e.g. some sort of inheritance reduce the amount of needed HW.Well that brings other problems, see i686 as an example here, but there's a large percentage of noarch packages in the distro so it's not a full 1:1 package:arch increment.I was not speaking about noarch. I assume that you can intermix x86_64_v1 code with x86_64_v3 code on x86_64_v3 capable HW. Is that correct? IOW there could be build just subset of packages for x86_64_v3 and rest would be inherited.aka similar to what was done with i386 and i686 back in the day, and then with ppc64 + ppc64p7 for a short period of time.
That predates my days here 🤷 But yes, that sounds as similar cases, so we might have some rusty know how.
Vít
Dan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
