Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of fire one more build? Users would need to choose v1 / v2 / v3 ISO but what else?I can think of three problems which would need to be dealt with 1. Resource limitations in infrastructure hardware. You are going to add to the amount of builds on 1 set of hardware which is already doing x86_64 and i686. You are going to add to the storage issues that Fedora Infrastructure has to juggle on the maximum 100TB koji partition (with 90TB causing some amount of degradation) due to extra packages and composes. 2. Resource limitations in infrastructure staff. Fedora Infra is doing more with less and each additional architecture and focus increases that load. 3. Resource limitations on packagers. Packagers will need to add yet another bug set to cover and determine "is it only on VX" or not.
Yes, understandably. But are there technical limitations?BTW I guess that e.g. some sort of inheritance reduce the amount of needed HW.
Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
