On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then
> x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of fire one
> more build? Users would need to choose v1 / v2 / v3 ISO but what else?
>
>
I can think of three problems which would need to be dealt with
1. Resource limitations in infrastructure hardware. You are going to
add to the amount of builds on 1 set of hardware which is already
doing x86_64 and i686. You are going to add to the storage issues that
Fedora Infrastructure has to juggle on the maximum 100TB koji
partition (with 90TB causing some amount of degradation) due to extra
packages and composes.
2. Resource limitations in infrastructure staff. Fedora Infra is doing
more with less and each additional architecture and focus increases
that load.
3. Resource limitations on packagers. Packagers will need to add yet
another bug set to cover and determine "is it only on VX" or not.
--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle. -- Ian MacClaren
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
